Skip to content

Consuming Grains: Are They Even Human Food?

picture of 3 bowls containing grains. Are these grains healthy to eat?
Is eating grains healthy?


Grains have been a staple in human diets for centuries, providing sustenance and nourishment to civilizations across the globe. However, as our understanding of nutrition deepens, questions arise about the naturalness of grain consumption and its potential impact on human health. In this blog post, I will explore the history of consuming grains, examine research that suggests grain consumption is a relatively recent phenomenon, and delve into the evidence pointing to potential health concerns associated with grains.

The Historical Consumption of Grains

Grains have played a significant role in human civilization, serving as a reliable source of energy and sustenance. The cultivation of grains began with the advent of agriculture around 10,000 years ago, marking a major shift from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to settled communities. Ancient civilizations such as the Mesopotamians, Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans relied heavily on grains, utilizing them for bread, porridge, and fermented beverages.

Research on the Recent Nature of Grain Consumption

Contrary to popular belief, humans have not been consuming grains for the entirety of our existence. Studies on dental remains and human fossils suggest that our ancient ancestors primarily subsisted on a diet consisting of meat, fish, fruits, vegetables, and nuts. It was not until the Neolithic period that the cultivation and consumption of grains became more prevalent.

One compelling line of research comes from studies conducted on the dental plaque of ancient humans. By analyzing the remnants of food particles preserved in dental calculus, scientists have found evidence of the shift in diet associated with the rise of agriculture. The increased consumption of grains coincided with an increase in dental cavities and dental problems, highlighting a potential link between grain consumption and adverse oral health. We now know that adverse oral health can be a reflection of adverse cardiovascular health.

Potential Health Concerns Associated with Grain Consumption

While grains are often praised for their fibre content and nutrient profile, some research suggests that they may have adverse effects on human health.

Anti-nutrients in Grains

One major concern is that grains contain anti-nutrients, such as phytic acid and lectins, which interfere with the absorption of certain minerals, including iron, zinc, and calcium. Phytic acid, also known as phytate, binds to these minerals, forming insoluble complexes that are poorly absorbed by the body. This contributes to mineral deficiencies over time, particularly in individuals who rely heavily on grains as a dietary staple.

Gluten-related Health Problems

Gluten, a protein found in wheat, barley, spelt, kamut, triticale, and rye, is associated with various health issues. Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder triggered by the consumption of gluten-containing foods, leading to intestinal inflammation, malabsorption, and other symptoms. Non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is another condition in which individuals experience adverse symptoms after consuming gluten, despite not having celiac disease. Symptoms may include digestive issues, fatigue, headaches, and joint pain.

Grains and Insulin Resistance and Diabetes

Grains, particularly refined grains, have a high glycemic index, meaning that they cause a rapid increase in blood sugar levels after consumption. This is problematic for individuals with diabetes or insulin resistance, as it may lead to difficulty in blood sugar control and potential long-term complications like heart disease and blindness.

Grains, Inflammation and Autoimmune Conditions:

Grains, particularly those containing gluten, may contribute to inflammation in susceptible individuals. Chronic inflammation is believed to play a role in the development of autoimmune conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Emerging evidence suggests that gluten, as well as other components of grains, trigger or exacerbate inflammation in genetically predisposed individuals.

Grains, Digestive Issues, and IBS

Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): NCGS refers to a condition in which individuals experience symptoms similar to those of celiac disease but without the presence of specific antibodies or intestinal damage. Studies have reported that a subset of individuals with IBS-like symptoms may experience symptom improvement when following a gluten-free diet, suggesting a link between NCGS and IBS.

Apart from gluten, another dietary factor associated with IBS symptoms is a group of carbohydrates known as fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs). FODMAPs are present in various grains and can trigger symptoms such as bloating, gas, abdominal pain, and altered bowel movements in individuals with IBS.

Grains such as wheat, rye, and barley contain high levels of fructans, which are a type of FODMAP. Limiting or eliminating high-FODMAP foods, including certain grains, has been found to reduce symptoms in individuals with IBS.

Glyphosate and Grains

Glyphosate is a widely used herbicide and the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup, among other commercial herbicides. It is often used in conventional farming practices to control weeds and improve crop yields. The use of glyphosate has raised concerns regarding its potential impact on grains and human health.

Glyphosate Residue Levels in Grains:

Glyphosate residues have been detected in various food products, including grains. A study conducted by the U.S. National Center for Food Safety and Technology found that glyphosate residues were present in a range of grain-based products, such as bread, cereals, and pasta. The residues are primarily the result of the direct application of glyphosate to crops or from its systemic absorption by genetically modified organisms (GMOs), such as glyphosate-tolerant crops like Roundup Ready corn and soybeans.

Health Concerns About Glyphosate:

There is ongoing debate and scientific research regarding the potential health impacts of glyphosate residues on human health. Here are a few key areas of concern:

a. Carcinogenicity of Glyphosate:

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a specialized agency of the World Health Organization (WHO), has classified glyphosate as a “probable human carcinogen” based on limited evidence of its association with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, other regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have maintained that glyphosate is unlikely to cause cancer in humans when used according to label instructions. The topic remains controversial, and further research is needed to fully understand the potential carcinogenic effects of glyphosate.

b. Disruption of Gut Microbiota Caused by Glyphosate:

Some studies suggest that glyphosate may disrupt the balance of beneficial bacteria in the gut. Glyphosate has been found to have antimicrobial properties that inhibit the growth of certain beneficial gut bacteria while allowing potentially harmful bacteria to thrive. This disruption may have implications for human health, as a healthy gut microbiome is essential for various physiological functions, including digestion, immune system regulation, and overall well-being.

c. Endocrine Disruption:

There is evidence to suggest that glyphosate may have endocrine-disrupting effects. Several studies have indicated that glyphosate-based herbicides interfere with hormone signalling pathways and disrupt normal hormonal balance. These disruptions may impact reproductive health, development, and other endocrine-regulated processes.

It is worth noting that the regulatory standards for acceptable glyphosate residue levels in food products vary between countries. Additionally, organic grains are generally grown without the use of synthetic pesticides, including glyphosate, which may offer an alternative for individuals concerned about glyphosate residues.

Further research is required to gain a comprehensive understanding of the potential health impacts of glyphosate residues on grains and human health. As the scientific community continues to investigate this topic, it is important to stay informed and monitor regulatory guidelines and recommendations.

Grain Consumption: Moderation and Context

While there is evidence suggesting many potential health concerns related to grain consumption, it is important to consider individual variability. Grains provide nutrients, including fibre, vitamins, and minerals, but these can be easily obtained from other foods as well, including fruit and vegetables.

The impact of grain consumption on health varies between individuals due to factors such as genetics, gut health, and overall dietary patterns. Some people may tolerate grains well, while others may experience adverse effects. It is crucial to listen to our bodies, be mindful of the quality of foods consumed, and consider individual needs and preferences.


The history of consuming grains spans thousands of years, with their introduction marking a significant shift in human civilization. However, research indicates that grain consumption is a more recent phenomenon and may not be as natural for our bodies as once believed. Evidence suggests potential health concerns associated with grain consumption, including adverse effects on oral health, the presence of anti-nutrients, digestive concerns, glyphosate residues, and the potential for gluten-related disorders.

As with any aspect of nutrition, balance and individuality are key. While some individuals may benefit from reducing or eliminating grains, others may find that moderate grain consumption fits well within their dietary preferences and needs. Understanding the science behind grain consumption can help individuals make informed choices about their own diets, promoting overall health and well-being.

References On Whether Grain Consumption Is Healthy:

  1. Aris A, Leblanc S. Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec, Canada. Reprod Toxicol. 2011 May;31(4):528-33. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.02.004. PMID: 21338670.
  2. Guyton KZ, Loomis D, Grosse Y, El Ghissassi F, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Scoccianti C, Mattock H, Straif K; International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group, IARC, Lyon, France. Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate. Lancet Oncol. 2015 May;16(5):490-1. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70134-8. PMID: 25864179.
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Glyphosate. Updated April 30, 2021. [Online]. Available:
  4. Shehata AA, Schrödl W, Aldin AA, Hafez HM, Krüger M. The effect of glyphosate on potential pathogens and beneficial members of poultry microbiota in vitro. Curr Microbiol. 2013 Apr;66(4):350-8. doi: 10.1007/s00284-012-0277-2. PMID: 23100452.
  5. Gasnier C, Dumont C, Benachour N, Clair E, Chagnon MC, Séralini GE. Glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic and endocrine disruptors in human cell lines. Toxicology. 2009 Aug 21;262(3):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.06.006. PMID: 19539684.
  6. Gibson PR, Shepherd SJ. Personal view: food for thought—western lifestyle and susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. The FODMAP hypothesis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Dec;21(12):1399-409. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02506.x. PMID: 15948806.
  7. Muir JG, Rose R, Rosella O, Liels K, Barrett JS, Shepherd SJ, Gibson PR. Measurement of short-chain carbohydrates in common Australian vegetables and fruits by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Nov 25;57(22):5540-4. doi: 10.1021/jf9001448. PMID: 19824728.
  8. Staudacher HM, Lomer MCE, Anderson JL, Barrett JS, Muir JG, Irving PM, Whelan K. Fermentable Carbohydrate Restriction Reduces Luminal Bifidobacteria and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. J Nutr. 2012;142(8):1510–1518. doi:10.3945/jn.112.159285
  9. Ludvigsson JF, Bai JC, Biagi F, Card TR, Ciacci C, Ciclitira PJ, Green PH, Hadjivassiliou M, Holdoway A, van Heel DA, Kaukinen K, Leffler DA, Leonard JN, Lundin KE, McGough N, Davidson M, Murray JA, Swift GL, Walker MM, Zingone F, Sanders DS, BSG Coeliac Disease Guidelines Development Group. Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut. 2014 Aug;63(8):1210-28. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306578. PMID: 24917550.
  10. Biesiekierski JR, Newnham ED, Irving PM, Barrett JS, Haines M, Doecke JD, Shepherd SJ, Muir JG, Gibson PR. Gluten causes gastrointestinal symptoms in subjects without celiac disease: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar;106(3):508-14; quiz 515. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.487. Epub 2011 Jan 11. PMID: 21224837.
  11. Carroccio A, Mansueto P, Iacono G, Soresi M, D’Alcamo A, Cavataio F, Brusca I, Florena AM, Ambrosiano G, Seidita A, Pirrone G, Rini GB. Non-celiac wheat sensitivity diagnosed by double-blind placebo-controlled challenge: exploring a new clinical entity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1898-906; quiz 1907. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.236. Epub 2012 Sep 4. PMID: 22944859.
  12. Catassi C, Bai JC, Bonaz B, Bouma G, Calabrò A, Carroccio A, Castillejo G, Ciacci C, Cristofori F, Dolinsek J, Francavilla R, Elli L, Green P, Holtmeier W, Koehler P, Koletzko S, Meinhold C, Sanders D, Schumann M, Schuppan D, Ullrich R, Vécsei A, Volta U, Zevallos V, Sapone A, Fasano A. Non-Celiac Gluten sensitivity: the new frontier of gluten-related disorders. Nutrients. 2013 Sep 26;5(10):3839-53. doi: 10.3390/nu5103839. PMID: 24077239; PMCID: PMC3820047.
  13. Vojdani A. A potential link between environmental triggers and autoimmunity. Autoimmune Dis. 2014;2014:437231. doi: 10.1155/2014/437231. Epub 2014 Apr 2. PMID: 24804219; PMCID: PMC4006993.
  14. Salmerón J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, Willett WC. Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA. 1997 Feb 12;277(6):472-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.277.6.472. PMID: 9020271.
  15. Hu EA, Pan A, Malik V, Sun Q. White rice consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis and systematic review. BMJ. 2012 Mar 15;344:e1454. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1454. PMID: 22422870; PMCID: PMC3307808.
  16. Brand-Miller JC, Holt SH, Pawlak DB, McMillan J. Glycemic index and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Jul;76(1):281S-285S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76/1.281S. PMID: 12081851.
  17. Ludvigsson JF, Leffler DA, Bai JC, Biagi F, Fasano A, Green PH, Hadjivassiliou M, Kaukinen K, Kelly CP, Leonard JN, Lundin KE, Murray JA, Sanders DS, Walker MM, Zingone F, Ciacci C. The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):43-52. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301346. PMID: 22345659.
  18. Schlemmer U, Frølich W, Prieto RM, Grases F. Phytate in foods and significance for humans: food sources, intake, processing, bioavailability, protective role and analysis. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009 Sep;53 Suppl 2:S330-75. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200900099. PMID: 19425054.
Spread the love